Cousin problems

 ( Complex Analysis ) 

In mathematics, the Cousin problems are two questions in several complex variables, concerning the existence of meromorphic functions that are specified in terms of local data. They were introduced in special cases by in 1895. They are now posed, and solved, for any complex manifold M, in terms of conditions on M.

For both problems, an open cover of M by sets U_i is given, along with a meromorphic function f_i on each U_i.

---

First Cousin problem The first Cousin problem or additive Cousin problem assumes that each difference $f\_i-f\_j$ is a holomorphic function, where it is defined. It asks for a meromorphic function f on M such that $f-f\_i$ is holomorphic on U_i; in other words, that f shares the singular behaviour of the given local function. The given condition on the $f\_i-f\_j$ is evidently necessary for this; so the problem amounts to asking if it is sufficient. The case of one variable is the Mittag-Leffler theorem on prescribing poles, when M is an open subset of the complex plane. Riemann surface theory shows that some restriction on M will be required. The problem can always be solved on a Stein manifold.

The first Cousin problem may be understood in terms of sheaf cohomology as follows. Let K be the sheaf of meromorphic functions and O the sheaf of holomorphic functions on M. A global section $f$ of K passes to a global section $\backslash phi(f)$ of the quotient sheaf K/ O. The converse question is the first Cousin problem: given a global section of K/ O, is there a global section of K from which it arises? The problem is thus to characterize the image of the map

$H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\})\; \backslash ,\; \backslash xrightarrow\{\backslash phi\}\; \backslash ,\; H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}/\backslash mathbf\{O\}).$

By the long exact cohomology sequence,

$H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\})\; \backslash ,\backslash xrightarrow\{\backslash phi\}\backslash ,\; H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}/\backslash mathbf\{O\})\backslash to\; H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\})$

is exact, and so the first Cousin problem is always solvable provided that the first cohomology group H¹( M, O) vanishes. In particular, by Cartan's theorem B, the Cousin problem is always solvable if M is a Stein manifold.

---

Second Cousin problem The second Cousin problem or multiplicative Cousin problem assumes that each ratio $f\_i/f\_j$ is a non-vanishing holomorphic function, where it is defined. It asks for a meromorphic function f on M such that $f/f\_i$ is holomorphic and non-vanishing. The second Cousin problem is a multi-dimensional generalization of the Weierstrass theorem on the existence of a holomorphic function of one variable with prescribed zeros.

The attack on this problem by means of taking , to reduce it to the additive problem, meets an obstruction in the form of the first Chern class (see also exponential sheaf sequence). In terms of sheaf theory, let $\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*$ be the sheaf of holomorphic functions that vanish nowhere, and $\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*$ the sheaf of meromorphic functions that are not identically zero. These are both then sheaves of , and the quotient sheaf $\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*/\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*$ is well-defined. The multiplicative Cousin problem then seeks to identify the image of quotient map $\backslash phi$

$H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*)\backslash xrightarrow\{\backslash phi\}\; H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*/\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*).$

The long exact sheaf cohomology sequence associated to the quotient is

$H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*)\backslash xrightarrow\{\backslash phi\}\; H^0(M,\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*/\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*)\backslash to\; H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*)$

so the second Cousin problem is solvable in all cases provided that $H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*)=0.$ The quotient sheaf $\backslash mathbf\{K\}^*/\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*$ is the sheaf of germs of on M. The question of whether every global section is generated by a meromorphic function is thus equivalent to determining whether every line bundle on M is trivial bundle.

The cohomology group $H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*),$ for the multiplicative structure on $\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*$ can be compared with the cohomology group $H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\})$ with its additive structure by taking a logarithm. That is, there is an exact sequence of sheaves

$0\backslash to\; 2\backslash pi\; i\backslash Z\backslash to\; \backslash mathbf\{O\}\; \backslash xrightarrow\{\backslash exp\}\; \backslash mathbf\{O\}^*\; \backslash to\; 0$

where the leftmost sheaf is the locally constant sheaf with fiber $2\backslash pi\; i\backslash Z$. The obstruction to defining a logarithm at the level of H¹ is in $H^2(M,\backslash Z)$, from the long exact cohomology sequence

$H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\})\backslash to\; H^1(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\}^*)\backslash to\; 2\backslash pi\; i\; H^2(M,\backslash Z)\; \backslash to\; H^2(M,\; \backslash mathbf\{O\}).$

When M is a Stein manifold, the middle arrow is an isomorphism because $H^q(M,\backslash mathbf\{O\})\; =\; 0$ for $q\; >\; 0$ so that a necessary and sufficient condition in that case for the second Cousin problem to be always solvable is that $H^2(M,\backslash Z)=0.$

---

See also

• Cartan's theorems A and B

• .
• .
• .

Post Comment